Submit
Send material for screening through a supported Alluvial route.
Our solution
Clearer signals
for careful
review.
Alluvial screens submissions and presents grounded findings for an editor to consider. Use it within a journal workflow or through the portal, depending on what works for your team.
SCREENING FINDINGSEDITOR REVIEW
01Text patternA finding with a location to inspectReview flag
02RepetitionA repeated passage may warrant a closer lookReview flag
Findings are signals, not conclusions
Designed to support your workflow
From submission
to informed review.
Screen
Alluvial checks for specific quality signals in the submission.
Review findings
Examine the returned findings and their context.
Decide
The editor applies their judgement and remains in control of the decision.
Familiar ways to use our tools
Choose the route
that fits
The same principle holds in each: Alluvial provides screening findings, and people decide what they mean.
Journal plugins
Screen new submissions from within your online journal platform. OJS remains in control of editor access, permissions, workflow and decisions.
IN YOUR EDITORIAL WORKFLOWSend a submission for screening by email and receive a reply with the result.
AN EASY AND FAMILIAR ROUTEWeb portal
Upload papers directly to the portal and screen them in bulk.
CENTRALISED ONLINE MANAGEMENTWho it helps
Make room for
worthwhile work
For teams responsible for reviewing scholarly submissions, applications and entries.
Help editors focus
their attention.
Surface screening findings for editors to assess, supporting more manageable review and helping protect reviewer time.
Screen papers
in batches.
Use the web portal to screen batches of papers and focus on the ones that need your attention.
Process entries
more consistently.
Give funding panels and essay-prize organisers a way to screen submissions and direct attention to entries for closer review.
Made for human review
The tool supports.
The editor decides.
Alluvial does not make editorial decisions, reject work, or select what deserves review. In OJS, local editor access and workflow remain under the journal’s control.
